Death Penalty Rewritten Essay

What does one learn intimately in a initiatory course of study composition clique in Appalachian State University? Afterreading from Dr Kimberly Gunter it is still unclear to this bring outr. Quotes fromthe wind up of this papersignified the two ends of the spectrum when it comes to the Death penalty Fry Em All and The Bleeding nerve center (Gunter, 38). This paper written by Dr. Kimberly Gunter from Appalachian State University initially appears on the surface to be about how the class she has been teaching for the last 15 weeks has looked to understand the death penalty in their nation and wherefore they oppose it. In the end Gunter describes how she drilld a topic that she obviously has strong opinions and emotionswith and has her students learn to write about it. The Title of this paper In Our call Rewriting the U.S. Death Penalty (32) suggests that maybe there were petitions put together for possible ratifications to the death penalty laws or at least a Billwritten an d presented to the state legislators for consideration. There is nothing in the paper suggesting all of that was accomplished.Gunter takes the commentator on a field take off with her class to a Maximum Security prison in North Carolina in a utmost research effort for a class project the students have been working on. Gunter uses analogies like the equating the melody in the prison smelling like a day of hog-killing (32) in an attempt to disgust the contributor from the beginning with the idea of death row.Gunter continues to describe low life prison guards and overly medicated innocent prisoners. Throwing in one liner comments from students whose life experience equates to growing up in privileged middle class families and having the opportunity to attendan established University like Appalachian State University. Gunter provides partial statistics in an attempt to show the reader her knowledge on the subject of Capital Punishment. As tha paper comes to a conclusion Gunter wa s attempting to integrate her students into faculty member writers and foc utilize on a singular project tied together by the death penalty.In her writings Gunter shows a bias towards the death penalty invoking imagesof dead pigs and fowl stenches in the readers mind. Gunter contradicts these images later in the paper when she describes thedeath chamber with a hospital gurney and crisp sheets on it. This is Gunters attempt at using a pathos argument. Gunter wants to show the humanity side of the death penalty but fails in shipway when she quotes a guard he out and out said rape isnt much of a problem in that prison, but last year, another guard, a bg barrel-chested sergeant who kept saying I like to fight, told me that, while the guards ruled the prison during the day, the prisoners ruled at night, and that prisoner rape was widespread and unbridled while the cell blocks were on nightly lockdown. (35). This example of rape in prison only helps solidify some readers minds about ca pital punishment and the inability of offenders to be rehabilitated.The writer does not use any evidence to support her argument which is not even clearly defined or understood in the paper. The reader finishes reading the work and searches for the true topic of the work, is it about the death penalty, is it about a first year composition class or is it about a transformation of the student to open their minds or take on different perspectives in life? It is never truly defined within the dead body of the work. There is misinformation in the body of work. Gunter is quoted on page 34 We learn that there ar no on-site educational programs.. This is untrue according to the Educational Services for the Department of Prisons in North Carolina.It is operose to identify if the writer of this work is successful in conveying her point to the reader. There is a use of pathos in the work that will pull on the emotions of the reader, but it is not clear what emotions be to be pulled on or t he wrong emotions are enacted. If the purpose of the paper was to showthat young college aged students are able to open their minds or embrace academic writing it was not successfully portrayed or documented in any way.Works CitedEducational Services. Educational Services. Web. 22 Nov. 2014. .Gunter, Kimberly K. I n Our Names Rewriting The U.S. Death Penalty. Writing On The Edge 21.2 (2011) 32-38. Education Research Complete . Web. 22 Nov. 2014.